Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21791 - 21800 of 58340 for speedy trial.

State v. Kathryn L. Johnson
as to the Intoxilyzer machine’s accuracy, the trial court erred by admitting its test results to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11224 - 2005-03-31

Samuels Recycling Company v. Continental Casualty Company
(2003-04)[1] relief from a judgment. The issue is whether the trial court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21052 - 2006-01-25

Farmers State Bank v. William P. Skemp
on the loan in February 1998. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the bank awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16129 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Marcia Lee Roessler v. Mark Edward Krueger
hearing evidence on Krueger’s motion, the trial court found that Krueger’s income was reduced to $17 per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2424 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Plover v. Dorothea W. Binagi
that the trial court erred by imposing this sanction, and reverse with directions to reinstate the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20564 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Antonio Herrera, Jr.
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his motion in limine to prevent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3644 - 2017-09-19

Waukesha County v. Devlin D.D.
Lake. At the time of the probable cause hearing on the ch. 51 petition, the trial court was informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13634 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 The Honorable Michael S. Gibbs presided over trial and entered the judgments of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83503 - 2014-09-15

State v. Carl J. Knapp
of sentence, but not known to the trial court at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9262 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] First Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Donald J. Gabryshak
2 trial court held that the bank did not violate the Act, and that it did not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2176 - 2017-09-19