Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2181 - 2190 of 13650 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
Search results 2181 - 2190 of 13650 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
6 open records request; (2) double jeopardy; (3) judicial bias; (4) extortion; (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107322 - 2017-09-21
6 open records request; (2) double jeopardy; (3) judicial bias; (4) extortion; (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107322 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
case. Here, the statutes set a mandatory minimum fine of $600, doubled to $1,200 because Gurtowski’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679980 - 2023-07-19
case. Here, the statutes set a mandatory minimum fine of $600, doubled to $1,200 because Gurtowski’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679980 - 2023-07-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. … There is only one expert. I think there’s a good argument that they should be able to double check what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31137 - 2014-09-15
. … There is only one expert. I think there’s a good argument that they should be able to double check what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31137 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the consecutive sentence to both of the concurrent sentences violates double jeopardy. Specifically, Schaar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33010 - 2014-09-15
of the consecutive sentence to both of the concurrent sentences violates double jeopardy. Specifically, Schaar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33010 - 2014-09-15
State v. Morgan Larson
in violation of his double-jeopardy protection. We reject these contentions and affirm. Larson was formerly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11254 - 2005-03-31
in violation of his double-jeopardy protection. We reject these contentions and affirm. Larson was formerly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11254 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and punitive damages, double damages under § 100.18(11)(d), costs and attorney fees. Green Box, through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147173 - 2015-08-24
and punitive damages, double damages under § 100.18(11)(d), costs and attorney fees. Green Box, through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147173 - 2015-08-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, through counsel, asserting a double jeopardy violation after a mistrial was declared during his first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088985 - 2026-03-10
, through counsel, asserting a double jeopardy violation after a mistrial was declared during his first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088985 - 2026-03-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, through counsel, asserting a double jeopardy violation after a mistrial was declared during his first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088985 - 2026-03-10
, through counsel, asserting a double jeopardy violation after a mistrial was declared during his first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088985 - 2026-03-10
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
noting that this figure would be further subject to statutory doubling. While neither party has cited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09
noting that this figure would be further subject to statutory doubling. While neither party has cited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09
[PDF]
State v. Karl P. Breitweiser
rule exists when the defendant raises a double jeopardy claim. State v. Robinson, 2002 WI 9, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4567 - 2017-09-19
rule exists when the defendant raises a double jeopardy claim. State v. Robinson, 2002 WI 9, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4567 - 2017-09-19