Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21801 - 21810 of 68502 for did.
Search results 21801 - 21810 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
mentioned promulgation of regulations by administrative agencies, but did No. 2015AP672 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159648 - 2017-09-21
mentioned promulgation of regulations by administrative agencies, but did No. 2015AP672 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159648 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Stephen S.
, Christina and Erik. Pamela, represented by her guardian, did not object to the termination of her parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11009 - 2017-09-19
, Christina and Erik. Pamela, represented by her guardian, did not object to the termination of her parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11009 - 2017-09-19
State v. John D. Meindl
giving them prima facie effect and did not erroneously exercise its discretion in admitting testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18687 - 2005-06-22
giving them prima facie effect and did not erroneously exercise its discretion in admitting testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18687 - 2005-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
Acevedo’s open window, and grabbed Acevedo’s wallet out of his hand. Acevedo testified that he did not give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79931 - 2012-03-27
Acevedo’s open window, and grabbed Acevedo’s wallet out of his hand. Acevedo testified that he did not give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79931 - 2012-03-27
State v. D. Ramee K. Fulani
10, 2002. Although in the courthouse, and, apparently, in the back of the courtroom, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6803 - 2005-03-31
10, 2002. Although in the courthouse, and, apparently, in the back of the courtroom, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6803 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reference during opening argument to a victim who did not testify. We affirm. ¶2 A familiar test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98373 - 2014-09-15
reference during opening argument to a victim who did not testify. We affirm. ¶2 A familiar test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98373 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
by denying his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32259 - 2014-09-15
by denying his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32259 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
him did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle, unlawfully extended the stop to administer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135400 - 2015-02-18
him did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle, unlawfully extended the stop to administer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135400 - 2015-02-18
[PDF]
Columbia County Department of Human Services v. Robert L. W.
were in foster care, Robert did not have telephone contact with his children but wrote them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6038 - 2017-09-19
were in foster care, Robert did not have telephone contact with his children but wrote them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6038 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the officer who stopped him did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135400 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the officer who stopped him did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135400 - 2017-09-21