Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21801 - 21810 of 41929 for jury duty/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Hernandez’s testimony as a part of its case against Miller. The jury found Miller guilty and the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913352 - 2025-02-11

[PDF] NOTICE
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Basil J. Krueger appeals a judgment of conviction, entered following a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56774 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Joseph H. Gray
was for the trier of fact, and we must adopt all reasonable inferences which support the jury’s verdict. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21482 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s guilty verdict, and to deny Martin’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33908 - 2014-09-15

State v. Joseph H. Gray
was for the trier of fact, and we must adopt all reasonable inferences which support the jury’s verdict. Id. at 504
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21482 - 2006-02-21

State v. Michael P. Fitzpatrick
erred by refusing to allow him to argue to the jury that an unloaded, cased rifle is not a firearm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17733 - 2005-04-13

Langlade County Department of Social Services v. Jeremy M., Sr.
The case was tried before a jury, which found against the department on the grounds of continuing need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5857 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, determination of damages, and denial of a jury trial. We reject Staeheli’s arguments and affirm. We also agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61248 - 2011-03-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-representation and his right to compulsory process. We affirm. No. 2013AP1651-CR 2 ¶2 After a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115773 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
because no jury had been called and therefore jeopardy had not attached. We agree that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76315 - 2012-01-10