Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21811 - 21820 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21811 - 21820 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-place claim dismissed. Delgado now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671825 - 2023-06-28
-place claim dismissed. Delgado now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671825 - 2023-06-28
[PDF]
State v. Everett L.O.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11779 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11779 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 102
of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Polashek, 2002 WI 74, ¶17, 253 Wis. 2d 527
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120491 - 2014-11-11
of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Polashek, 2002 WI 74, ¶17, 253 Wis. 2d 527
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120491 - 2014-11-11
[PDF]
Hugh R. Mommsen v. Duane Schueller
we review de novo. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434 N.W.2d 773, 778
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14709 - 2017-09-21
we review de novo. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853, 434 N.W.2d 773, 778
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14709 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 77
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. DOR v. River City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436240 - 2021-12-09
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. DOR v. River City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436240 - 2021-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts in question “satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587783 - 2022-11-08
the facts in question “satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587783 - 2022-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS
and prejudicial to his or her client’s defense is a question of law that we review de novo. Trawitzki, 244 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39257 - 2009-08-10
and prejudicial to his or her client’s defense is a question of law that we review de novo. Trawitzki, 244 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39257 - 2009-08-10
James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission
of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13464 - 2005-03-31
of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13464 - 2005-03-31
Diane Haddican-Czestler v. Mitchell J. Barrock
review questions of law de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13587 - 2005-03-31
review questions of law de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13587 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel claim is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Id., ¶18. Balliette explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70478 - 2011-09-06
counsel claim is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Id., ¶18. Balliette explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70478 - 2011-09-06