Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21811 - 21820 of 29828 for des.
Search results 21811 - 21820 of 29828 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decisions de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Smith v. Dodgeville Mut. Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93318 - 2013-02-25
judgment decisions de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Smith v. Dodgeville Mut. Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93318 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
Frontsheet
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184689 - 2017-09-21
a referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184689 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous, we uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247408 - 2019-12-12
clearly erroneous, we uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247408 - 2019-12-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
of this appeal turns on the application of WIS. STAT. § 757.19. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59234 - 2014-09-15
of this appeal turns on the application of WIS. STAT. § 757.19. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59234 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that we review de novo. Wausau Tile, Inc., 226 Wis. 2d at 245, 593 N.W.2d at 450. With these standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35269 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. Wausau Tile, Inc., 226 Wis. 2d at 245, 593 N.W.2d at 450. With these standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35269 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Keith Love v. John Eversman
. In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14266 - 2014-09-15
. In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14266 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54852 - 2010-09-27
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54852 - 2010-09-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. “[T]he purpose of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265112 - 2020-06-23
). “Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. “[T]he purpose of statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265112 - 2020-06-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
….” No. 2007AP2406 6 interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. Rechsteiner v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42800 - 2014-09-15
….” No. 2007AP2406 6 interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. Rechsteiner v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42800 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review of summary judgments is de novo; we apply the same methodology as the trial court and consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80533 - 2014-09-15
review of summary judgments is de novo; we apply the same methodology as the trial court and consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80533 - 2014-09-15