Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21811 - 21820 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

[PDF] State v. Montreavous L. Gray
for release from custody for purposes of providing cooperation to drug trafficking investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7267 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
Wisconsin State Prison Employees Waupun Local 18, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Taycheedah Correctional Center and Drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-09

[PDF] NOTICE
a judgment of the circuit court. Specifically, he challenges an order denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56318 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Victor Yancey
and that it occurred because of a drug deal, and did not remember telling the detective that he gave his son $70
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10191 - 2017-09-20

State v. Montreavous L. Gray
that his plea agreement provided for release from custody for purposes of providing cooperation to drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7267 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Willie C. Simpson v. David H. Schwarz
OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3461 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] FRW Corporation v. City of New Berlin
be explained by the volume of business being done in the building. The water meter was subsequently tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7789 - 2017-09-19

Appeal No
two-pronged statutory test: first, was the time spent in “custody” and, second, if “custody
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26690 - 2006-10-04

[PDF] Appeal No. 2005AP1492-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2002CF1593
sentence credit questions are resolved under a familiar two- pronged statutory test: first, was the time
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26690 - 2014-09-15

Brian Read v. Donald Read
Source of APPEAL Appeal from an order Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9632 - 2005-03-31