Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21821 - 21830 of 29828 for des.
Search results 21821 - 21830 of 29828 for des.
07AP1521 State v. Tyler J.K.
trial is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31564 - 2008-01-22
trial is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31564 - 2008-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient and whether the parent was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107968 - 2014-02-12
performance was deficient and whether the parent was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107968 - 2014-02-12
Donald W. Vodak v. Martin Kinyon
misrepresentations. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11749 - 2005-03-31
misrepresentations. We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11749 - 2005-03-31
wi app 12 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP767-CR Complete Title ...
. As such, determining the meaning of the word in a jury instruction is a legal question that we review de novo. Cf. id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132253 - 2015-03-11
. As such, determining the meaning of the word in a jury instruction is a legal question that we review de novo. Cf. id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132253 - 2015-03-11
[PDF]
State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
reviews de novo. See State v. Mendoza, 227 Wis.2d 838, 849, 596 N.W.2d 736, 742 (1999). We follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14408 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo. See State v. Mendoza, 227 Wis.2d 838, 849, 596 N.W.2d 736, 742 (1999). We follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14408 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jacqee R. Anderson
de novo review. See id. at 310. If we conclude that Anderson’s motion fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15871 - 2017-09-21
de novo review. See id. at 310. If we conclude that Anderson’s motion fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15871 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. Id., ¶12. No. 2022AP655-CR 8 ¶20 Vandervere asserts that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827597 - 2024-07-24
of law we review de novo. Id., ¶12. No. 2022AP655-CR 8 ¶20 Vandervere asserts that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827597 - 2024-07-24
[PDF]
Charles Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.
, 162 Wis. 2d 797, 802, 471 N.W.2d 7 (1991). We apply a de novo standard when reviewing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17364 - 2017-09-21
, 162 Wis. 2d 797, 802, 471 N.W.2d 7 (1991). We apply a de novo standard when reviewing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17364 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, whether the facts entitle the defendant to withdraw his plea is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96281 - 2013-05-01
, whether the facts entitle the defendant to withdraw his plea is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96281 - 2013-05-01
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Bell
of statutes and their application to the facts— which we decide de novo. State v. Schoepp, 204 Wis.2d 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11601 - 2017-09-19
of statutes and their application to the facts— which we decide de novo. State v. Schoepp, 204 Wis.2d 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11601 - 2017-09-19