Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21821 - 21830 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 21821 - 21830 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as aggravating factors at sentencing. ¶4 Zellmer moved for postconviction relief, pursuing claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887630 - 2024-12-11
as aggravating factors at sentencing. ¶4 Zellmer moved for postconviction relief, pursuing claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887630 - 2024-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
and that is necessary to his plea withdrawal claim; and (2) Levi’s purported recantation does not constitute newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39258 - 2009-08-10
and that is necessary to his plea withdrawal claim; and (2) Levi’s purported recantation does not constitute newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39258 - 2009-08-10
CA Blank Order
further.[3] In his response Esters claims that his appellate counsel fails to consider and discuss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121009 - 2014-09-09
further.[3] In his response Esters claims that his appellate counsel fails to consider and discuss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121009 - 2014-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
of burglary. In a pro se postconviction motion, Russell claimed twenty-one instances of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53135 - 2010-08-09
of burglary. In a pro se postconviction motion, Russell claimed twenty-one instances of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53135 - 2010-08-09
[PDF]
The Equitable Bank v. James C. McDonald
as to Equitable’s knowledge of the McDonalds’ prior lien or ownership interest. They also claim that the Chabrons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14919 - 2017-09-21
as to Equitable’s knowledge of the McDonalds’ prior lien or ownership interest. They also claim that the Chabrons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14919 - 2017-09-21
Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. James LaBelle
in violation of Lacy’s rights. Lacy’s claims against him for damages under § 146.84, Stats., and 42 U.S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
in violation of Lacy’s rights. Lacy’s claims against him for damages under § 146.84, Stats., and 42 U.S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Russell W. Weber v. Terrence M. Crossin
subsequently initiated this action against the Crossins, claiming that the latter were strictly responsible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15503 - 2017-09-21
subsequently initiated this action against the Crossins, claiming that the latter were strictly responsible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15503 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
his safe place[1] and negligence claims. Freeman slipped on a wet floor at Airgas-North Central, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77893 - 2012-02-13
his safe place[1] and negligence claims. Freeman slipped on a wet floor at Airgas-North Central, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77893 - 2012-02-13
Russell W. Weber v. Terrence M. Crossin
and was in need of replacement. The Webers subsequently initiated this action against the Crossins, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15503 - 2005-03-31
and was in need of replacement. The Webers subsequently initiated this action against the Crossins, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15503 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. We reject Kerscher’s claim and affirm the orders. ¶2 In January 2008, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91734 - 2013-01-22
. We reject Kerscher’s claim and affirm the orders. ¶2 In January 2008, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91734 - 2013-01-22