Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21831 - 21840 of 68502 for did.
Search results 21831 - 21840 of 68502 for did.
State v. Milton H. Smith
provided to him in the Informing the Accused form did not comply with the implied consent law because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31
provided to him in the Informing the Accused form did not comply with the implied consent law because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony S. Szablewski
did you say that to my girlfriend?" After Reinertson replied that he did not know what Szablewski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11203 - 2017-09-19
did you say that to my girlfriend?" After Reinertson replied that he did not know what Szablewski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11203 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bernard A. James
that would preclude participation in the program. No. 01-1452-CR 3 trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4022 - 2017-09-20
that would preclude participation in the program. No. 01-1452-CR 3 trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4022 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
performance,” and, therefore, postconviction/appellate counsel did not perform deficiently by failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194499 - 2017-09-21
performance,” and, therefore, postconviction/appellate counsel did not perform deficiently by failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194499 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“probation is appropriate where somebody needs supervision,” and Counihan did not need “that type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226578 - 2018-11-06
“probation is appropriate where somebody needs supervision,” and Counihan did not need “that type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226578 - 2018-11-06
COURT OF APPEALS
, however, did not state that each count was subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of twenty-five years.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57070 - 2010-11-23
, however, did not state that each count was subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of twenty-five years.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57070 - 2010-11-23
2010 WI APP 32
that the forgery statute did not apply to altered prescriptions. After initially ruling that the forgery statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45727 - 2010-02-23
that the forgery statute did not apply to altered prescriptions. After initially ruling that the forgery statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45727 - 2010-02-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
did not file a response. After our independent review of the record, we concluded that there were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314475 - 2020-12-15
did not file a response. After our independent review of the record, we concluded that there were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314475 - 2020-12-15
State v. David J. Brock
explained that he did not have a state I.D., but provided his Tecumseh work identification card, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7631 - 2005-03-31
explained that he did not have a state I.D., but provided his Tecumseh work identification card, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7631 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 152
with the notice of hearing.[3] Regardless, the court did not stay the commitment order pending the hearing, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40925 - 2009-10-27
with the notice of hearing.[3] Regardless, the court did not stay the commitment order pending the hearing, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40925 - 2009-10-27