Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21831 - 21840 of 57247 for id.
Search results 21831 - 21840 of 57247 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
the opposing party to a trial. Id., ¶24. We view the materials in the light most favorable to the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34767 - 2008-12-03
the opposing party to a trial. Id., ¶24. We view the materials in the light most favorable to the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34767 - 2008-12-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of his or her training and experience.” Id. at 424. ¶10 Whether there was reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183670 - 2017-09-21
of his or her training and experience.” Id. at 424. ¶10 Whether there was reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183670 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Watertown v. Brent A. Genz
administering a PBT test, see id. at 439, 588 N.W.2d at 275, the trial court properly first considered only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14963 - 2017-09-21
administering a PBT test, see id. at 439, 588 N.W.2d at 275, the trial court properly first considered only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14963 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
novo. Id. The safeguards of Miranda apply only when a suspect is “in custody.” A person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28813 - 2007-06-26
novo. Id. The safeguards of Miranda apply only when a suspect is “in custody.” A person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28813 - 2007-06-26
State v. Rayfe J. Paulick
is ambiguous if reasonable minds could differ as to its meaning. See id. “‘[T]he ability of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11760 - 2005-03-31
is ambiguous if reasonable minds could differ as to its meaning. See id. “‘[T]he ability of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11760 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason J. Groff
; therefore, [the civil penalty provision] does not apply. Id. at 20, 501 N.W.2d at 823 (emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13336 - 2017-09-21
; therefore, [the civil penalty provision] does not apply. Id. at 20, 501 N.W.2d at 823 (emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13336 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a house for purposes of search or arrest is presumptively unreasonable. Id. at 750. In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20082 - 2014-09-15
of a house for purposes of search or arrest is presumptively unreasonable. Id. at 750. In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20082 - 2014-09-15
State v. Donald R. Davis
friend. The caller ID also displayed the same pay phone number that had been displayed during the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4455 - 2005-03-31
friend. The caller ID also displayed the same pay phone number that had been displayed during the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4455 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
protection of the public, punishment, rehabilitation, and deterrence. Id., ¶40. “Sentencing decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112928 - 2017-09-21
protection of the public, punishment, rehabilitation, and deterrence. Id., ¶40. “Sentencing decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112928 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jody L. Stehle
of prejudice is made. See id. at 588, 543 N.W.2d at 513-14. Prejudice is presumed when a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12389 - 2017-09-21
of prejudice is made. See id. at 588, 543 N.W.2d at 513-14. Prejudice is presumed when a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12389 - 2017-09-21