Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21841 - 21850 of 91112 for 1.
Search results 21841 - 21850 of 91112 for 1.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914079 - 2025-02-19
for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914079 - 2025-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-22).1 J.L.’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918447 - 2025-02-26
-22).1 J.L.’s appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918447 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
Lois Kroener v. State of Wisconsin Employe Trust Funds Board
summons is a fundamental defect which deprives the court of jurisdiction over the party, we affirm.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14497 - 2017-09-21
summons is a fundamental defect which deprives the court of jurisdiction over the party, we affirm.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14497 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
remanded with directions. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95461 - 2014-09-15
remanded with directions. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95461 - 2014-09-15
State v. Larry L. McAffee
modification motion.[1] Because we conclude that McAffee failed to make a prima facie showing that a "new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9247 - 2005-03-31
modification motion.[1] Because we conclude that McAffee failed to make a prima facie showing that a "new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9247 - 2005-03-31
Traci J. Purdy v. Brian M. Purdy
remanded with directions. Before Dykman, Roggensack and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3813 - 2005-03-31
remanded with directions. Before Dykman, Roggensack and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3813 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. Buchholz
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Joseph P. Buchholz has appealed from a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4161 - 2017-09-20
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Joseph P. Buchholz has appealed from a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4161 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Norman O. Brown v. Cathy Ennis
and rebates and any activity operated at R.C.I. since its opening. Under § 19.35 (1)(h), STATS., a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11893 - 2017-09-21
and rebates and any activity operated at R.C.I. since its opening. Under § 19.35 (1)(h), STATS., a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11893 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. BISCHEL, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J.[1] Deanne Treml appeals a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44406 - 2009-12-07
. BISCHEL, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J.[1] Deanne Treml appeals a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44406 - 2009-12-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
County: JOHN SIEFERT, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Sandra Murray, pro se, brought this small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54834 - 2014-09-15
County: JOHN SIEFERT, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Sandra Murray, pro se, brought this small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54834 - 2014-09-15