Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21841 - 21850 of 29712 for des.
Search results 21841 - 21850 of 29712 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the facility. The corporation counsel decided not to contest the de facto transfer of Emily to Beaver’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29415 - 2014-09-15
to the facility. The corporation counsel decided not to contest the de facto transfer of Emily to Beaver’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29415 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel L. Ortiz
statute, WIS. STAT. § 973.20. We review this question de novo without deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19
statute, WIS. STAT. § 973.20. We review this question de novo without deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Mitchell Bank v. Thomas G. Schanke
unless clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (1999-2000). We review questions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4072 - 2017-09-20
unless clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (1999-2000). We review questions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4072 - 2017-09-20
Robert Miesen v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
. Construction of a statute or its application to a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14708 - 2005-03-31
. Construction of a statute or its application to a particular set of facts is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14708 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 148
conduct breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40411 - 2014-09-15
conduct breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40411 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶26. We determine de novo whether the defendant has demonstrated deficiency and prejudice. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98794 - 2014-09-15
, ¶26. We determine de novo whether the defendant has demonstrated deficiency and prejudice. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98794 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Woodward Commc’ns, Inc. v. Shockley Commc’ns Corp., 2001 WI App 30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33963 - 2008-09-08
is a question of law that we review de novo. Woodward Commc’ns, Inc. v. Shockley Commc’ns Corp., 2001 WI App 30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33963 - 2008-09-08
2008 WI APP 85
] Hilliard appeals. Discussion ¶12 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32637 - 2008-06-24
] Hilliard appeals. Discussion ¶12 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32637 - 2008-06-24
Tara N. v. Economy Fire & Casualty Insurance Company
we review de novo by applying the same methodology as the trial court. See Taryn E.F. v. Joshua M.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8310 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo by applying the same methodology as the trial court. See Taryn E.F. v. Joshua M.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8310 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to a fair trial and raises a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ¶14 We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81333 - 2012-04-17
to a fair trial and raises a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ¶14 We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81333 - 2012-04-17