Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21841 - 21850 of 68326 for did.
Search results 21841 - 21850 of 68326 for did.
Al Belmore v. Department of Industry
that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying the petition and that the agency's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10368 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying the petition and that the agency's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10368 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stephen S.
, Christina and Erik. Pamela, represented by her guardian, did not object to the termination of her parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11009 - 2017-09-19
, Christina and Erik. Pamela, represented by her guardian, did not object to the termination of her parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11009 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bernard A. James
that would preclude participation in the program. No. 01-1452-CR 3 trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4022 - 2017-09-20
that would preclude participation in the program. No. 01-1452-CR 3 trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4022 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
did not make or rely on factual findings to determine whether Wieczorek had a reasonable expectation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
did not make or rely on factual findings to determine whether Wieczorek had a reasonable expectation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
State v. Sean Patrick Okray
court did not grant him the proper amount of pre-sentence credit; and (4) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13126 - 2005-03-31
court did not grant him the proper amount of pre-sentence credit; and (4) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13126 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
various excuses for why it did not violate his rules of supervision. ¶4 The DOC decided to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09
various excuses for why it did not violate his rules of supervision. ¶4 The DOC decided to revoke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09
Sally J. Schultz-Fuhrman v. James R. Fuhrman
, not for evidence to support findings the court could have but did not reach. See Steiner v. Steiner, 2004 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26285 - 2006-08-28
, not for evidence to support findings the court could have but did not reach. See Steiner v. Steiner, 2004 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26285 - 2006-08-28
[PDF]
Daniel Frasch v. Marianne A. Cooke
is not entitled to certiorari review because (1) No. 98-1786 2 Frasch did not demonstrate that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14186 - 2014-09-15
is not entitled to certiorari review because (1) No. 98-1786 2 Frasch did not demonstrate that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14186 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Martin drove away and, as he did so, rear-ended a vehicle. Martin, however, did not stop, and the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93385 - 2013-04-29
Martin drove away and, as he did so, rear-ended a vehicle. Martin, however, did not stop, and the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93385 - 2013-04-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the United States in 1993. He did not become a citizen, but was here legally on a “green card” starting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239636 - 2019-04-25
to the United States in 1993. He did not become a citizen, but was here legally on a “green card” starting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239636 - 2019-04-25