Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21841 - 21850 of 28806 for f.

State v. Luis A. Trujillo
of Trujillo’s motion for plea withdrawal, we may consider “[f]acts adduced at the preliminary hearing.” White v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2531 - 2005-03-31

State v. James B. Smits
), a prohibited alcohol concentration means “[i]f the person has 2 prior convictions, suspensions or revocations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2550 - 2005-03-31

Jennifer B. Coleman v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
in § 632.26(1)(b).” Lexington Ins. Co. v. Rugg & Knopp, Inc., 165 F.3d 1087, 1094-95 (7th Cir. 1999). Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2408 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph J. H.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Pierce County: DANE F. MOREY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6181 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
on the following newly discovered evidence, as outlined in his brief: 1) a sworn affidavit from Joseph F. Soulier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76556 - 2012-01-17

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Colleen A.
judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f). [2] Colleen told Anderson that she could not complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4836 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2007-08). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37590 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Darryl A. Harding
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (1999- 2000). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4008 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Under Marquardt’s lease, “[i]f damage results from [Marquardt’s] failure to maintain a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250477 - 2019-11-21

[PDF] Chuck Belke v. M & I First National Bank of Stevens Point
him under the law is not absolute. Bank of Waunakee v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc., 906 F.2d 1185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9309 - 2017-09-19