Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21841 - 21850 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 21841 - 21850 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion.1 He claims that the verdicts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50001 - 2014-09-15
2 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion.1 He claims that the verdicts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50001 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
serious doubt about M.H.’s credibility. 3 Haakenstad claimed that, because the allegedly omitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181279 - 2017-09-21
serious doubt about M.H.’s credibility. 3 Haakenstad claimed that, because the allegedly omitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181279 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court denied his claims and we affirmed. State v. Mull, No. 2001AP3166-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149448 - 2017-09-21
. The circuit court denied his claims and we affirmed. State v. Mull, No. 2001AP3166-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149448 - 2017-09-21
Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. James LaBelle
in violation of Lacy’s rights. Lacy’s claims against him for damages under § 146.84, Stats., and 42 U.S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
in violation of Lacy’s rights. Lacy’s claims against him for damages under § 146.84, Stats., and 42 U.S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and that is necessary to his plea withdrawal claim; and (2) Levi’s purported recantation does not constitute newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39258 - 2009-08-10
and that is necessary to his plea withdrawal claim; and (2) Levi’s purported recantation does not constitute newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39258 - 2009-08-10
[PDF]
State v. Vonnie D. Darby
and raising claims that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel and his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5418 - 2017-09-19
and raising claims that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel and his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5418 - 2017-09-19
David G. Paeske v. Joanell W. Paeske
issue was Joanell’s claim for maintenance. Also in dispute was whether property brought to the marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11282 - 2005-03-31
issue was Joanell’s claim for maintenance. Also in dispute was whether property brought to the marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11282 - 2005-03-31
Gregory Toth v. Richco Structures
fault; (3) whether Toth failed to prove the negligence claim; and (4) whether recovery for future pain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5272 - 2005-03-31
fault; (3) whether Toth failed to prove the negligence claim; and (4) whether recovery for future pain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5272 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Darren M. Mueller v. Sgt. Reamer
, in small claims court, alleging damages arising from Reamer’s treatment of Mueller. The case was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15968 - 2017-09-21
, in small claims court, alleging damages arising from Reamer’s treatment of Mueller. The case was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15968 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report first addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim that Crump received ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241342 - 2019-05-28
report first addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim that Crump received ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241342 - 2019-05-28