Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21841 - 21850 of 77773 for restraining order.
Search results 21841 - 21850 of 77773 for restraining order.
Ericka Clark v. Devin R. Mudge, M.D.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Racine County: RICHARD J. KREUL, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14980 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Racine County: RICHARD J. KREUL, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14980 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael B. Ilkka
from an order of the circuit court for Iowa County: William D. Dyke, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16175 - 2014-04-28
from an order of the circuit court for Iowa County: William D. Dyke, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16175 - 2014-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
and Heidi Baudry, Defendants-Respondents. APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47472 - 2011-03-01
and Heidi Baudry, Defendants-Respondents. APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47472 - 2011-03-01
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
entered the following opinion and order: 2024AP2077 Racine County HSD v. K.M. (L.C. #2022GN91
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069548 - 2026-01-28
entered the following opinion and order: 2024AP2077 Racine County HSD v. K.M. (L.C. #2022GN91
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069548 - 2026-01-28
Julie M. Lassa v. Todd Rongstad
fees and forfeitures as sanctions for failing to comply with discovery orders.[1] ¶3 Rongstad asserts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25913 - 2006-07-12
fees and forfeitures as sanctions for failing to comply with discovery orders.[1] ¶3 Rongstad asserts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25913 - 2006-07-12
[PDF]
Julie M. Lassa v. Todd Rongstad
with discovery orders.1 ¶3 Rongstad asserts that the sanctions in this case cannot stand for essentially four
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25913 - 2017-09-21
with discovery orders.1 ¶3 Rongstad asserts that the sanctions in this case cannot stand for essentially four
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25913 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dunn County: JAMES M. PETERSON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058517 - 2026-01-06
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dunn County: JAMES M. PETERSON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058517 - 2026-01-06
[PDF]
Chapter 72 - Retention of Court Records
commenced under chapter 801 of the statutes: 20 years after entry of final order. (2) Civil court
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087 - 2017-09-20
commenced under chapter 801 of the statutes: 20 years after entry of final order. (2) Civil court
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087 - 2017-09-20
Chapter 72 - Retention of Court Records
under chapter 801 of the statutes: 20 years after entry of final order. (2) Civil court
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1087 - 2005-03-31
under chapter 801 of the statutes: 20 years after entry of final order. (2) Civil court
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1087 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 24
party's discovery request and with court orders to provide discovery, and in making misrepresentations
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35946 - 2014-09-15
party's discovery request and with court orders to provide discovery, and in making misrepresentations
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35946 - 2014-09-15