Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21851 - 21860 of 48119 for WA 0852 2611 9277 [[GLORION]] Pemborong Kitchen Set Warna Abu Tua Maple Park Sunter Jakarta Utara.

[PDF] NOTICE
Wis. 2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989). Whether a fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33533 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691620 - 2023-08-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The definition of a new factor is set forth in case law. It is “‘a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=688005 - 2023-08-10

[PDF] NOTICE
at 268 (citation and two sets of quotation marks omitted). Appropriate sentencing factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55648 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
granted. After setting forth the applicable legal standards, the court explained: While the plaintiff can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103820 - 2013-11-04

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
.” The court set a hearing for May 2, 2023, to address attorney fees, specifically identifying that date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769595 - 2024-02-28

COURT OF APPEALS
factor is ‘“a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99252 - 2013-07-15

[PDF] Gary Delbert Richmond v. Carol Kay Richmond
. § 767.25(1m) and (1n). We agree. ¶12 The interpretation of a statute and its application to a set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3868 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
may be applied to a defendant whose direct appeal was addressed under the no-merit procedure set
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177080 - 2017-09-21

Jane Drangstviet v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
). That methodology has been set forth numerous times, and we need not repeat it here. See Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8477 - 2005-03-31