Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21861 - 21870 of 84318 for case number.
Search results 21861 - 21870 of 84318 for case number.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992751 - 2025-08-05
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992751 - 2025-08-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be sufficiently helpful to protect the public. Just in case there is any confusion about this, I am making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126712 - 2017-09-21
be sufficiently helpful to protect the public. Just in case there is any confusion about this, I am making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126712 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Community Development Authority of the City of Glendale v. Hancock Fabrics, Inc.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has defined mootness, as relevant to this case, as follows: A moot case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18716 - 2017-09-21
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has defined mootness, as relevant to this case, as follows: A moot case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18716 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792288 - 2024-04-24
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792288 - 2024-04-24
CA Blank Order
to resolve his case with a plea agreement. In exchange for guilty pleas, the State agreed to amend
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146571 - 2015-08-16
to resolve his case with a plea agreement. In exchange for guilty pleas, the State agreed to amend
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146571 - 2015-08-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
4, 2014, the circuit court granted partial dismissal in the present case, noting the parties had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156536 - 2017-09-21
4, 2014, the circuit court granted partial dismissal in the present case, noting the parties had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156536 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2020 WI 83 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP236-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301098 - 2020-10-30
2020 WI 83 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP236-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301098 - 2020-10-30
[PDF]
State v. David J. Fury
that Fury was guilty of possessing a controlled substance. This appeal, though it carries two case numbers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9959 - 2017-09-19
that Fury was guilty of possessing a controlled substance. This appeal, though it carries two case numbers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9959 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction counsel filed a no-merit report and Sheriff did not respond. We held that Sheriff’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85107 - 2014-09-15
postconviction counsel filed a no-merit report and Sheriff did not respond. We held that Sheriff’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85107 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
covered by the request for admission. The court explained that the Estate had advanced a number
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211864 - 2018-04-24
covered by the request for admission. The court explained that the Estate had advanced a number
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211864 - 2018-04-24