Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21861 - 21870 of 68502 for did.
Search results 21861 - 21870 of 68502 for did.
State v. Mark Nelson
that the trial court erred when it admitted certain evidence. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3959 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred when it admitted certain evidence. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3959 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 152
crossed in the mail with the notice of hearing.3 Regardless, the court did not stay the commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40925 - 2014-09-15
crossed in the mail with the notice of hearing.3 Regardless, the court did not stay the commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40925 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark Nelson
that the trial court erred when it admitted certain evidence. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3959 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court erred when it admitted certain evidence. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3959 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
Martin drove away and, as he did so, rear-ended a vehicle. Martin, however, did not stop, and the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93385 - 2013-04-29
Martin drove away and, as he did so, rear-ended a vehicle. Martin, however, did not stop, and the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93385 - 2013-04-29
State v. David L. Kons
to the admissibility of the audio tapes—that the trial court did not personally listen to the tapes prior to ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7960 - 2005-03-31
to the admissibility of the audio tapes—that the trial court did not personally listen to the tapes prior to ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7960 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David G. Huusko
, the court did not want the trial to be delayed. ¶8 At trial, King testified for the State. He stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4582 - 2017-09-19
, the court did not want the trial to be delayed. ¶8 At trial, King testified for the State. He stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4582 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, did not cooperate with Mora’s demand for “everything” and struggled with Mora instead. Mora told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97974 - 2013-06-10
, did not cooperate with Mora’s demand for “everything” and struggled with Mora instead. Mora told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97974 - 2013-06-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
provided at the revocation hearing, Curtis’s probation agent testified that he did not have a valid
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622140 - 2023-02-15
provided at the revocation hearing, Curtis’s probation agent testified that he did not have a valid
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622140 - 2023-02-15
[PDF]
State v. Gary O. McKenzie
this step upon McKenzie’s motion, which did not inform the court of McKenzie’s earlier pursuit of relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26196 - 2017-09-21
this step upon McKenzie’s motion, which did not inform the court of McKenzie’s earlier pursuit of relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26196 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sean Patrick Okray
court did not grant him the proper amount of pre-sentence credit; and (4) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13126 - 2005-03-31
court did not grant him the proper amount of pre-sentence credit; and (4) that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13126 - 2005-03-31