Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21861 - 21870 of 68502 for did.
Search results 21861 - 21870 of 68502 for did.
Wood County Department of Human Services v. Denise F. R.
). She further contends that the circuit court did not grant a proper continuance because it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4816 - 2005-03-31
). She further contends that the circuit court did not grant a proper continuance because it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4816 - 2005-03-31
Wood County Department of Human Services v. Denise F. R.
). She further contends that the circuit court did not grant a proper continuance because it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4815 - 2005-03-31
). She further contends that the circuit court did not grant a proper continuance because it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4815 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
]” his plea. He said that he felt that he “didn’t receive the proper counsel, nor did it seem like
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728139 - 2023-11-14
]” his plea. He said that he felt that he “didn’t receive the proper counsel, nor did it seem like
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728139 - 2023-11-14
State v. Michael V. Hendricks
court for his motion.[4] On January 23, 2002, Hendricks did not appear in court, but his father did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5208 - 2005-03-31
court for his motion.[4] On January 23, 2002, Hendricks did not appear in court, but his father did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5208 - 2005-03-31
Michael S. Zeller v. Dennis D. Stockel
, but did not contain a legal description for any of the three parcels. ¶3 On March 29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18186 - 2005-05-17
, but did not contain a legal description for any of the three parcels. ¶3 On March 29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18186 - 2005-05-17
[PDF]
State v. Xavier Lorenzo Brown
and that the trial court did not impose an unduly harsh sentence. Therefore, we affirm. Brown and his co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9491 - 2017-09-19
and that the trial court did not impose an unduly harsh sentence. Therefore, we affirm. Brown and his co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9491 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
Geffert, of the Reedsburg Police Department, testified, as did Dewitt. ¶3 Officer Johnson testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50202 - 2014-09-15
Geffert, of the Reedsburg Police Department, testified, as did Dewitt. ¶3 Officer Johnson testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50202 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark Nelson
that the trial court erred when it admitted certain evidence. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3959 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred when it admitted certain evidence. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3959 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 152
crossed in the mail with the notice of hearing.3 Regardless, the court did not stay the commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40925 - 2014-09-15
crossed in the mail with the notice of hearing.3 Regardless, the court did not stay the commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40925 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark Nelson
that the trial court erred when it admitted certain evidence. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3959 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court erred when it admitted certain evidence. Because we conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3959 - 2017-09-20