Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21871 - 21880 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21871 - 21880 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Gammons
of law that we review de novo. Id. 3 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2247 - 2017-09-19
of law that we review de novo. Id. 3 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2247 - 2017-09-19
James C. Thomson v. United Water Services Milwaukee, LLC
review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5647 - 2005-03-31
review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5647 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether the deficient performance was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47621 - 2010-03-03
was deficient and whether the deficient performance was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47621 - 2010-03-03
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson
Wis. 2d 714, 605 N.W.2d 836. Finally, we construe a deferred prosecution agreement de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4687 - 2017-09-19
Wis. 2d 714, 605 N.W.2d 836. Finally, we construe a deferred prosecution agreement de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4687 - 2017-09-19
State v. James L. Kurtz
of reasonableness is a question of law, which [we] review[] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20149 - 2005-11-09
of reasonableness is a question of law, which [we] review[] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20149 - 2005-11-09
[PDF]
Kickers of Wisconsin, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
judgment and involves interpretation and application of § 70.11(4), STATS., our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8018 - 2017-09-19
judgment and involves interpretation and application of § 70.11(4), STATS., our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8018 - 2017-09-19
Foremost Farms USA v. Shelly Zettler
presenting questions of law, which we review de novo. Moonlight v. Boyce, 125 Wis. 2d 298, 303, 372 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7050 - 2005-03-31
presenting questions of law, which we review de novo. Moonlight v. Boyce, 125 Wis. 2d 298, 303, 372 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7050 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
has been denied due process and sentenced on inaccurate information is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115293 - 2014-06-23
has been denied due process and sentenced on inaccurate information is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115293 - 2014-06-23
Sanford Gibson v. Department of Corrections
(DOR) interpretation of one of its directives, we decided de novo whether a DOR directive was a rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8117 - 2005-03-31
(DOR) interpretation of one of its directives, we decided de novo whether a DOR directive was a rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8117 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v. Irish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15123 - 2005-03-31
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v. Irish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15123 - 2005-03-31