Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21871 - 21880 of 29823 for des.

Orville Oney v. Wolfgang Schrauth
review de novo, by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8386 - 2005-03-31

State v. Scott Michael Harwood
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶11 Although a police officer’s warrantless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6031 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Walworth County Department of Health & Human Services v. Patricia H.
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 301, 541 N.W.2d 115 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4623 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 17
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Long, 2011 WI App 146, ¶4, 337 Wis. 2d 648
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91595 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jonothan Gils
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law that we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2170 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
is a question of law, which we normally review de novo. See DeMars v. LaPour, 123 Wis. 2d 366, 370, 366 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4505 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Certification
under a given factual scenario is a question of law that [the appellate court] reviews de novo.” Id
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192262 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether the court erred in its application of the legal standards for assessing property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170913 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Shane M. Heimerl v. Waverly Beach, Inc.
or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 124 Wis. 2d 275, 278
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6320 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶26. We determine de novo whether the defendant has demonstrated deficiency and prejudice. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98794 - 2014-09-15