Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21871 - 21880 of 65039 for or b.

[PDF] Land Title Services, Inc. v. Donald W. Kemnitz, Jr.
Wisconsin law its right to subrogation. No. 02-1257 6 B. Assignment of claim. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5245 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Joshua Beaulieu v. David H. Schwarz
contentions are irrelevant. B. Catch-All Exception ¶16 Further, we conclude that Gruper’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4145 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139959 - 2015-04-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
the family…. [and] (b) [A]t least one year has elapsed since the order denying periods of physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27265 - 2006-11-27

CA Blank Order
fifth offense, as a repeater, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 346.63(1)(a) and 939.62(1)(b); and (2) felony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145255 - 2015-07-28

State v. Joachim E. Dressler
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21642 - 2006-03-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
determined that Menger’s sentence was neither “unjust” nor “unfair” “[b]ecause … the error committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906580 - 2025-01-29

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
)(b). Stephens’s appeal is not brought pursuant to RULE 809.30 and he had ninety days to appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989608 - 2025-07-30

State v. Willie S. Gray, Jr.
to a crime, contrary to §§ 943.32(1)(b), 943.32(2), 939.05, and 939.641, Stats. He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14056 - 2005-03-31

State v. Leonard McDowell
was not entitled to the relief he sought—that is, he was not entitled to a new trial. B. Postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10418 - 2005-03-31