Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21871 - 21880 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 21871 - 21880 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
a hearing. We conclude that the record conclusively establishes that Greer is not entitled to relief, so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54126 - 2014-09-15
a hearing. We conclude that the record conclusively establishes that Greer is not entitled to relief, so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54126 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
liability and did not otherwise understand the concept. Because the record supports the conclusion Perez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132233 - 2014-12-29
liability and did not otherwise understand the concept. Because the record supports the conclusion Perez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132233 - 2014-12-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290960 - 2020-09-29
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290960 - 2020-09-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The State may use any evidence showing that the plea was valid and may rely on any portion of the Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40469 - 2014-09-15
. The State may use any evidence showing that the plea was valid and may rely on any portion of the Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40469 - 2014-09-15
State v. Darrin L. Britt
resentencing; (10) that the trial court improperly considered his juvenile record when sentencing him; (11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10224 - 2005-03-31
resentencing; (10) that the trial court improperly considered his juvenile record when sentencing him; (11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10224 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
independent review of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93868 - 2013-03-05
independent review of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93868 - 2013-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Stynes
.2d 753, 756 (Ct. App. 1991) (quoted source omitted). Based on our review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13186 - 2017-09-21
.2d 753, 756 (Ct. App. 1991) (quoted source omitted). Based on our review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13186 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778472 - 2024-03-26
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778472 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853242 - 2024-09-24
independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853242 - 2024-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853242 - 2024-09-24
independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853242 - 2024-09-24