Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21881 - 21890 of 30242 for de.

[PDF] State v. Michael S. Behnken
met is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Liebnitz, 231 Wis. 2d 272, 283 ¶14, 603
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3287 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. John Warren
the other prong. See id. at 697. Proof of either prong is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14149 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Adela S. Hagen v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Statutory interpretation is a question of law which a court generally reviews under a de novo standard
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16899 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶9 Based upon our review of the record, we are not persuaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34641 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Frontsheet
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222212 - 2018-10-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was denied the right to a speedy trial de novo. Borhegyi, 222 Wis. 2d at 508. ¶16 The threshold question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187316 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Liborio Cianciolo v. Antonina Cianciolo
court’s decision de novo. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980). ¶7 Liborio
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14903 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
court’s probable cause determination at a preliminary hearing is de novo. See State v. Johnson, 231 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209155 - 2018-03-07

COURT OF APPEALS
is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30066 - 2007-08-22

State of Wisconsin Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Bell
of statutes and their application to the facts—which we decide de novo. State v. Schoepp, 204 Wis.2d 266, 270
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11601 - 2005-03-31