Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21881 - 21890 of 68502 for did.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2024AP644-CR 4 it. When Bauer did not move, Shields repeated the request, and Bauer stated, “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1067748 - 2026-01-27

COURT OF APPEALS
. The plaintiffs sought an injunction ordering the transfer of funds they did not yet possess and declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-09

[PDF] Michael S. Zeller v. Dennis D. Stockel
, but did not contain a legal description for any of the three parcels. ¶3 On March 29, 2000, Dennis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18186 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John D. Meindl
effect and did not erroneously exercise its discretion in admitting testimony on Meindl’s HGN test, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18687 - 2017-09-21

Wood County Department of Human Services v. Denise F. R.
). She further contends that the circuit court did not grant a proper continuance because it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4816 - 2005-03-31

Wood County Department of Human Services v. Denise F. R.
). She further contends that the circuit court did not grant a proper continuance because it failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4815 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at the time the plea is taken). Similarly, though the trial court did not read the deportation warning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140559 - 2017-09-21

Racine County Human Services Department v. Frank W.
in an underlying CHIPS order. We hold that the juvenile court did not misuse its discretion in terminating Frank’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7620 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and 1951 deeds did not share a common point of beginning and therefore created a “deed overlap.” He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66677 - 2011-06-27

[PDF] Sally J. Schultz-Fuhrman v. James R. Fuhrman
the court could have but did not reach. See Steiner v. Steiner, 2004 WI App 169, ¶18, 276 Wis. 2d 290
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26285 - 2017-09-21