Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21881 - 21890 of 28812 for f.
Search results 21881 - 21890 of 28812 for f.
State v. Edward W. Ruzga
] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2003-04). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26514 - 2006-09-19
] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2003-04). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26514 - 2006-09-19
State v. Bernard E. Burgess
of sentence modification, a new factor is a: [F]act or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31
of sentence modification, a new factor is a: [F]act or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31
Everett Carlson v. Oconto County Board of Canvassers
outcome. See Reich v. District Lodge 720, 11 F.3d 1496, 1500 (9th Cir. 1993). We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2765 - 2005-03-31
outcome. See Reich v. District Lodge 720, 11 F.3d 1496, 1500 (9th Cir. 1993). We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2765 - 2005-03-31
State v. Adrian Castelan-Martinez
by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2003-04). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24892 - 2006-04-25
by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2003-04). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24892 - 2006-04-25
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Zastrow
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Marathon County: RAYMOND F. THUMS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15424 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Marathon County: RAYMOND F. THUMS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15424 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, in violation of WIS. STAT. §§ 941.30(1), 939.50(3)(f), 939.05 and 939.63(1) (2005-06).1 The following facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34164 - 2014-09-15
, in violation of WIS. STAT. §§ 941.30(1), 939.50(3)(f), 939.05 and 939.63(1) (2005-06).1 The following facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34164 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, [i]f it appears from the evidence in the case or from other showing by a party that an informer may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50286 - 2014-09-15
, [i]f it appears from the evidence in the case or from other showing by a party that an informer may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50286 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Shane M. Kringen
of the circuit court for St. Croix County: C.A. RICHARDS and EDWARD F. VLACK, Judges. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5791 - 2017-09-19
of the circuit court for St. Croix County: C.A. RICHARDS and EDWARD F. VLACK, Judges. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5791 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Teresita J.
) The duration of the separation of the parent from the child. (f) Whether the child will be able
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12195 - 2017-09-21
) The duration of the separation of the parent from the child. (f) Whether the child will be able
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12195 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989). Our supreme court has explained: “[i]f the court does base its sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148642 - 2017-09-21
, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989). Our supreme court has explained: “[i]f the court does base its sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148642 - 2017-09-21