Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21881 - 21890 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] State v. Lisa A. Carter
, this court applied the Phillips test in reaching the opposite conclusion under the facts of Richling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14142 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
chemical test of his blood, which revealed a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.204. ¶6 Schnoll
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=515012 - 2022-04-28

[PDF] NOTICE
.” Id. The United States Supreme Court has developed a test, the Townsend/Tucker test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30845 - 2014-09-15

State v. Johnny Lacy
claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek independent DNA testing, but again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16081 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 49
to a Voice Stress Analysis test (VSAT). The law, as pronounced in State v. Davis, 2008 WI 71, 310 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46586 - 2014-09-15

Milwaukee Police Association v. The City of Milwaukee
Retired Teachers adopted a three-factor test to determine whether attorneys fees should be awarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12247 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶12 We apply the Blockburger3 test to determine whether offenses are identical in law. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334301 - 2021-02-17

[PDF] Tricia L. Cefalu v. Continental Western Insurance Company
enter a field that has no sensible or just stopping point. ¶11 The test of cause-in-fact is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18844 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Joseph J. Jares, M.D. v. Peter F. Ullrich, M.D.
OF DUTY TO DEFEND ¶10 In Smith II, the supreme court set out the legal test for determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5903 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Fond Du Lac County v. Donald D. Mentzel
when testing the constitutional validity of a statute is set forth in State v. Mitchell, 163 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7969 - 2017-09-19