Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21891 - 21900 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 21891 - 21900 of 63951 for records/1000.
State v. Kenneth L. Moucha
in the record, or is not based on the applicable law. Id. Moucha claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13322 - 2005-03-31
in the record, or is not based on the applicable law. Id. Moucha claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13322 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
administrative notice of a departmental record under Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 140.16(2) (July 2008). We address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81977 - 2012-05-02
administrative notice of a departmental record under Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 140.16(2) (July 2008). We address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81977 - 2012-05-02
[PDF]
State v. Tecia D.B.
will not reverse a court’s discretionary decision unless the record shows that it failed to exercise discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6837 - 2017-09-20
will not reverse a court’s discretionary decision unless the record shows that it failed to exercise discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6837 - 2017-09-20
State v. Joe J. Davis
on the ground that there was not any evidence in the record that Davis had provided the required notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2256 - 2005-03-31
on the ground that there was not any evidence in the record that Davis had provided the required notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2256 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on the record before us, we cannot determine whether in the communication between the chancellor and the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62775 - 2011-04-11
on the record before us, we cannot determine whether in the communication between the chancellor and the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62775 - 2011-04-11
[PDF]
State v. Henry J. Brookshire
went through all of that on the record, right? THE DEFENDANT: Right, and that was after I took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9258 - 2017-09-19
went through all of that on the record, right? THE DEFENDANT: Right, and that was after I took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9258 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145687 - 2017-09-21
not filed a response. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145687 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
guardian.” Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314220 - 2020-12-16
guardian.” Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314220 - 2020-12-16
[PDF]
State v. Jerry W. Krueger
with a 1 The record does not include any reason Krueger provided for the refusal: Q Did you ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15755 - 2017-09-21
with a 1 The record does not include any reason Krueger provided for the refusal: Q Did you ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15755 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the no-merit reports and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362377 - 2021-05-04
consideration of the no-merit reports and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362377 - 2021-05-04