Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21891 - 21900 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 21891 - 21900 of 58500 for speedy trial.
State v. John D. Tiggs, Jr.
on his own actions and inaction. We therefore affirm the trial court order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4459 - 2005-03-31
on his own actions and inaction. We therefore affirm the trial court order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4459 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
rights to Aundre W. She challenges the trial court’s findings, entered on her default, that she failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20309 - 2014-09-15
rights to Aundre W. She challenges the trial court’s findings, entered on her default, that she failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20309 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interview at the bench trial. We conclude that Stevens has not overcome the presumption that the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213549 - 2018-05-30
interview at the bench trial. We conclude that Stevens has not overcome the presumption that the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213549 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Pierre A. LaForte
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, second offense. He contends the trial court erred by denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11000 - 2017-09-19
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, second offense. He contends the trial court erred by denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11000 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James Robleski v. C.R. Meyer and Sons Company
that we decide without deference to the trial court. See Heritage Mut. Ins. Co. v. Truck Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14182 - 2014-09-15
that we decide without deference to the trial court. See Heritage Mut. Ins. Co. v. Truck Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14182 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
been ineffective when he failed to file a motion to withdraw his guilty plea based on a claim of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32721 - 2008-05-19
been ineffective when he failed to file a motion to withdraw his guilty plea based on a claim of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32721 - 2008-05-19
[PDF]
City of Wisconsin Rapids v. Wayne J. Oltesvig
concentration, first offense, and judgment was entered accordingly. 2 Oltesvig argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20828 - 2017-09-21
concentration, first offense, and judgment was entered accordingly. 2 Oltesvig argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20828 - 2017-09-21
Mark William Jagla v. Douglas J. Guenthner
contends that the trial court erred by concluding that as a matter of law none of the three named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9154 - 2005-03-31
contends that the trial court erred by concluding that as a matter of law none of the three named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9154 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl P. Fike
that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court erred: (1) by instructing the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8980 - 2005-03-31
that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court erred: (1) by instructing the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8980 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Alan C. Olson & Associates v. Susannah Q. Carey
and cause remanded with directions. ¶1 FINE, J. Susannah Q. Carey appeals, pro se, from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7249 - 2017-09-20
and cause remanded with directions. ¶1 FINE, J. Susannah Q. Carey appeals, pro se, from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7249 - 2017-09-20