Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2191 - 2200 of 13657 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
Search results 2191 - 2200 of 13657 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is true of Fowler’s contention that his convictions are multiplicitous and violated double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74190 - 2014-09-15
is true of Fowler’s contention that his convictions are multiplicitous and violated double jeopardy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74190 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, through counsel, asserting a double jeopardy violation after a mistrial was declared during his first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088985 - 2026-03-10
, through counsel, asserting a double jeopardy violation after a mistrial was declared during his first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088985 - 2026-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
a good argument that they should be able to double check what that expert said. It’s certainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31137 - 2007-12-10
a good argument that they should be able to double check what that expert said. It’s certainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31137 - 2007-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Karl P. Breitweiser
rule exists when the defendant raises a double jeopardy claim. State v. Robinson, 2002 WI 9, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4567 - 2017-09-19
rule exists when the defendant raises a double jeopardy claim. State v. Robinson, 2002 WI 9, ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4567 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
convictions are multiplicitous and violated double jeopardy. See generally State v. Derango, 2000 WI 89, ¶26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74190 - 2011-11-21
convictions are multiplicitous and violated double jeopardy. See generally State v. Derango, 2000 WI 89, ¶26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74190 - 2011-11-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it doubling back on its prior routes and driving away from the squad car. Eventually, the vehicle parked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709729 - 2023-10-03
it doubling back on its prior routes and driving away from the squad car. Eventually, the vehicle parked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709729 - 2023-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
further contends that it was improperly subjected to double-jeopardy by having to appear before small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31864 - 2008-02-19
further contends that it was improperly subjected to double-jeopardy by having to appear before small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31864 - 2008-02-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the consecutive sentence to both of the concurrent sentences violates double jeopardy. Specifically, Schaar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33010 - 2014-09-15
of the consecutive sentence to both of the concurrent sentences violates double jeopardy. Specifically, Schaar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33010 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial. Double jeopardy did not attach here. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675322 - 2023-07-05
of a violation of the constitutional right to a speedy trial. Double jeopardy did not attach here. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675322 - 2023-07-05
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the Double Jeopardy Clause; (3) the ALJ’s “time” credit calculations were incorrect; and (4) he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084172 - 2026-03-04
the Double Jeopardy Clause; (3) the ALJ’s “time” credit calculations were incorrect; and (4) he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084172 - 2026-03-04