Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2191 - 2200 of 21731 for warrants.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
is sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial. See id. We will uphold the trial court’s discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28335 - 2007-03-05

State v. Cordell A. Bufford
the officers were aware of the fact that they did not have a search warrant to enter the room and requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2856 - 2005-03-31

State v. Percell L. Parker
the officers were aware of the fact that they did not have a search warrant to enter the room and requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2620 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50188 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
on May 1, 2008, and approached him because he had “an outstanding felony warrant out of Probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57475 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on the particular facts of this case, as the police intrusion into Basler’s home occurred without a warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240916 - 2019-05-15

[PDF] State v. Scott Michael Harwood
the police to enter Harwood’s apartment without a search warrant. We therefore affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6031 - 2017-09-19

State v. Rick R. Rome
, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2418 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress evidence obtained during a traffic stop—and after his arrest for an outstanding warrant—because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307115 - 2020-11-24

State v. Richard M. Pease, Jr.
failed to establish a Brady violation sufficient to warrant a new trial. ¶10 Pease further alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16288 - 2005-03-31