Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21911 - 21920 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 21911 - 21920 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Sinai Samaritan Medical Center, Inc. v. Morgan Mc Cabe
because he was Jean McCabe's husband. He raises two issues. First, he contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8460 - 2005-03-31
because he was Jean McCabe's husband. He raises two issues. First, he contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8460 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn A. Timm
offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). Timm contends that the trial court erroneously denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4847 - 2005-03-31
offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). Timm contends that the trial court erroneously denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4847 - 2005-03-31
State v. Delano L. Terrell
to Wis. Stat. § 940.225(2)(h) (2003-04).[2] Terrell contends that the trial court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25920 - 2006-08-29
to Wis. Stat. § 940.225(2)(h) (2003-04).[2] Terrell contends that the trial court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25920 - 2006-08-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to purported hearsay testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901380 - 2025-01-22
that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to purported hearsay testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901380 - 2025-01-22
State v. Jonathon R. Torres
and six months. Wis. Stat. § 939.50(1)(3)(i) (2003).[1] In October 2002, Torres asked the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6102 - 2005-03-31
and six months. Wis. Stat. § 939.50(1)(3)(i) (2003).[1] In October 2002, Torres asked the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6102 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael G.
inducements and false promises. This court rejects his arguments and affirms the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2639 - 2005-03-31
inducements and false promises. This court rejects his arguments and affirms the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2639 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan R. Torres
and six months. Wis. Stat. § 939.50(1)(3)(i) (2003).[1] In October 2002, Torres asked the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6101 - 2005-03-31
and six months. Wis. Stat. § 939.50(1)(3)(i) (2003).[1] In October 2002, Torres asked the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
based on: (1) the circuit court’s admission of other acts evidence at trial, over Sanford’s objections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010201 - 2025-09-18
based on: (1) the circuit court’s admission of other acts evidence at trial, over Sanford’s objections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010201 - 2025-09-18
State v. Jesus R.
. Jesus R. appeals from trial court orders terminating his parental rights and denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11792 - 2005-03-31
. Jesus R. appeals from trial court orders terminating his parental rights and denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11792 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James E. Gray
2 party to a crime, following a bench trial. He argues that the evidence was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14818 - 2017-09-21
2 party to a crime, following a bench trial. He argues that the evidence was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14818 - 2017-09-21