Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21921 - 21930 of 64778 for b's.

Milwaukee District Council 48 v. Milwaukee County
the receipt of pension benefits accrued from years of prior service. b) Pension funds which are vested belong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13912 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mark B. Watts v. The Medical Protective Company
DISTRICT II MARK B. WATTS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF VICKY L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14992 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT FOR OUTAGAMIE COUNTY, THE HONORABLE GREGORY B. GILL, JR., PRESIDING, RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204664 - 2017-12-05

[PDF] WI 3
with a representation, in violation of SCR 20:1.15(b)(1)2 (Count One); (2) by failing to notify Kernosky promptly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91259 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. § 343.32(2)(b), which assigns different demerit points for different levels of speeding. Under § 343.32(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29612 - 2007-07-04

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 20, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeal...
the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 111.335(1)(b) (2007-08).[1] The ALJ further determined that the County terminated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112661 - 2014-05-19

City of Middleton v. Daniel L. Barrett
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10324 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Thomas H. Highman
concentration (PAC) in violation of WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) and (b). The initial appearance was scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3735 - 2017-09-19

State v. Douglas A. Cavallari
to deliver controlled substances. The State cites to Townsend for the proposition that if A sells drugs to B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11753 - 2005-03-31

State v. Yolanda L.
not contribute to the TPR decision; thus, this court concludes that any error was harmless. B. Ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5808 - 2005-03-31