Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21921 - 21930 of 29832 for des.
Search results 21921 - 21930 of 29832 for des.
[PDF]
State v. James A. Johnson
State v. Keith, 216 Wis. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). We also review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16160 - 2017-09-21
State v. Keith, 216 Wis. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). We also review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16160 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review of summary judgments is de novo; we apply the same methodology as the trial court and consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80533 - 2014-09-15
review of summary judgments is de novo; we apply the same methodology as the trial court and consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80533 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mardie Hartenstein v. Pekin Insurance Company
to decide that case.” II. ¶15 We review a trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25506 - 2017-09-21
to decide that case.” II. ¶15 We review a trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25506 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Buena Vista Shores Marina v. Michael B. Poston
judgment. No. 2005AP2036 5 DISCUSSION ¶8 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25628 - 2017-09-21
judgment. No. 2005AP2036 5 DISCUSSION ¶8 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25628 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. MARIA-LUCIA A. CARDOSO, A/K/A M.-LUCIA DE A. CARDOSO, DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130922 - 2017-09-21
., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. MARIA-LUCIA A. CARDOSO, A/K/A M.-LUCIA DE A. CARDOSO, DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶10 A defendant who requests resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115293 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶10 A defendant who requests resentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115293 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher Deon Vance
review is de novo. State v. Holloway, 202 Wis. 2d 694, 697-98, 551 N.W.2d 841 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5772 - 2005-03-31
review is de novo. State v. Holloway, 202 Wis. 2d 694, 697-98, 551 N.W.2d 841 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5772 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally, we determine the appropriate level of discipline given the particular
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133827 - 2015-01-27
, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally, we determine the appropriate level of discipline given the particular
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133827 - 2015-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Coston, 222 Wis. 2d at 23. ¶6 “‘Protective placement’ means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946179 - 2025-04-24
is a question of law that we review de novo. Coston, 222 Wis. 2d at 23. ¶6 “‘Protective placement’ means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946179 - 2025-04-24
Catharine M. Lawton v. Town of Barton
of her amended complaint. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶9 We review de novo the circuit court’s granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7364 - 2005-03-31
of her amended complaint. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶9 We review de novo the circuit court’s granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7364 - 2005-03-31