Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21921 - 21930 of 29828 for des.
Search results 21921 - 21930 of 29828 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88998 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88998 - 2014-09-15
Lauralynn Stahnke v. Emilio Lontok, M.D.
notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. A motion for JNOV may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9442 - 2005-03-31
notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. A motion for JNOV may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9442 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn R. Lee
. The construction of a statute, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13055 - 2005-03-31
. The construction of a statute, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13055 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J. Lenz
that we review de novo. See State v. Slaughter, 200 Wis.2d 190, 196, 546 N.W.2d 490, 493 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15331 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See State v. Slaughter, 200 Wis.2d 190, 196, 546 N.W.2d 490, 493 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15331 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231334 - 2019-01-02
that we review de novo. See State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231334 - 2019-01-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
which we review de novo.” Ibid. (citation omitted; italics added). A trial court misuses its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67302 - 2014-09-15
which we review de novo.” Ibid. (citation omitted; italics added). A trial court misuses its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67302 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶17 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133694 - 2017-09-21
was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶17 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133694 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ilse C. Wood v. Gerald G. Wood, Jr.
We perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same methodology employed by circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6811 - 2017-09-20
We perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same methodology employed by circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6811 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 568, ¶26. We determine de novo whether the defendant has demonstrated deficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98794 - 2013-07-01
Wis. 2d 568, ¶26. We determine de novo whether the defendant has demonstrated deficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98794 - 2013-07-01
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24