Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21931 - 21940 of 98578 for civil court case status online.
Search results 21931 - 21940 of 98578 for civil court case status online.
Rainbow Springs Golf Company, Inc. v. Town of Mukwonago
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 1, 2005 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18333 - 2005-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 1, 2005 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18333 - 2005-05-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William J. Gilbert
2004 WI 144 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 04-1285-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16832 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI 144 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 04-1285-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16832 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William J. Gilbert
2004 WI 144 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 04-1285-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16832 - 2017-09-21
2004 WI 144 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 04-1285-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16832 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
action. Both parties filed actions against each other. The cases were consolidated in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215635 - 2018-07-17
action. Both parties filed actions against each other. The cases were consolidated in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215635 - 2018-07-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination that there was no reasonable suspicion to justify the seizure. In this case, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857880 - 2024-10-08
determination that there was no reasonable suspicion to justify the seizure. In this case, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857880 - 2024-10-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on purposeful discrimination.” (Emphasis added.) The court at the outset found that a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214316 - 2018-06-19
on purposeful discrimination.” (Emphasis added.) The court at the outset found that a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214316 - 2018-06-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. argues that the court’s summary judgment was not appropriate in this case because the summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181450 - 2017-09-21
. argues that the court’s summary judgment was not appropriate in this case because the summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181450 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at these hearings in connection with their cases. As that testimony is not relevant to D.D.S., this court only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353512 - 2021-04-06
at these hearings in connection with their cases. As that testimony is not relevant to D.D.S., this court only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353512 - 2021-04-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2013 WI App 96 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP11-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100067 - 2017-09-21
2013 WI App 96 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP11-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100067 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be sentenced “from zero to the maximum.” The circuit court then passed the case to allow Walker to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353334 - 2021-04-06
be sentenced “from zero to the maximum.” The circuit court then passed the case to allow Walker to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353334 - 2021-04-06