Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21931 - 21940 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21931 - 21940 of 30242 for de.
Gregory A. Gensler v. Doris J. Vander Kooi
is unambiguous, its construction is purely a question of law, which we review de novo. Edlin v. Soderstrom, 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7115 - 2005-03-31
is unambiguous, its construction is purely a question of law, which we review de novo. Edlin v. Soderstrom, 83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7115 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84159 - 2012-06-26
N.W.2d 125. We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. Id. Finally
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84159 - 2012-06-26
State v. Robert K.
of law subject to our de novo review. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663, 607 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7670 - 2005-03-31
of law subject to our de novo review. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663, 607 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7670 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous, but we determine de novo whether those facts demonstrate that the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33032 - 2008-06-16
unless they are clearly erroneous, but we determine de novo whether those facts demonstrate that the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33032 - 2008-06-16
State v. Ronald V. Kurszewski
, the breach of such a bargain has been held to be a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Wills
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9198 - 2005-03-31
, the breach of such a bargain has been held to be a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Wills
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9198 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randall K. Mataya
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. If we conclude on a threshold basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13671 - 2005-03-31
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. If we conclude on a threshold basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13671 - 2005-03-31
The Estate of Robert Murray v. The Travelers Insurance Company
to de novo review by the appellate court. See Sauk County v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 202 Wis.2d 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13653 - 2005-03-31
to de novo review by the appellate court. See Sauk County v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 202 Wis.2d 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13653 - 2005-03-31
Linda S. Merkel v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
Whether an employee engaged in misconduct is a question of law that we review de novo. Charette v. Labor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5927 - 2005-03-31
Whether an employee engaged in misconduct is a question of law that we review de novo. Charette v. Labor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5927 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84685 - 2012-07-09
, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84685 - 2012-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
¶11 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Borek Cranberry Marsh, Inc. v. Jackson Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86915 - 2012-09-10
¶11 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Borek Cranberry Marsh, Inc. v. Jackson Cnty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86915 - 2012-09-10