Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21941 - 21950 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21941 - 21950 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
is a question of law, which we normally review de novo. See DeMars v. LaPour, 123 Wis. 2d 366, 370, 366 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4505 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law, which we normally review de novo. See DeMars v. LaPour, 123 Wis. 2d 366, 370, 366 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4505 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
are not convinced. ¶23 Whether charges are multiplicitous is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57466 - 2010-12-06
are not convinced. ¶23 Whether charges are multiplicitous is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57466 - 2010-12-06
State v. Jason M. Collins
review de novo. See State v. Lohmeier, 205 Wis.2d 183, 191-92, 556 N.W.2d 90, 93 (1996). In our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13658 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State v. Lohmeier, 205 Wis.2d 183, 191-92, 556 N.W.2d 90, 93 (1996). In our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13658 - 2005-03-31
WI APP 102 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2491-CR Complete Ti...
“discovery” in Wis. Stat. § 939.74(2)(b). The interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120491 - 2014-10-28
“discovery” in Wis. Stat. § 939.74(2)(b). The interpretation of a statute is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120491 - 2014-10-28
Betty L. Runchey-Wolff v. William A. Wolff
the court’s decision. See Schauer v. De Neveu Homeowners Ass’n, 194 Wis.2d 62, 71, 533 N.W.2d 470, 473 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15268 - 2005-03-31
the court’s decision. See Schauer v. De Neveu Homeowners Ass’n, 194 Wis.2d 62, 71, 533 N.W.2d 470, 473 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15268 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether it prejudiced the parent are questions of law we review de novo. See id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252609 - 2020-01-23
was deficient and whether it prejudiced the parent are questions of law we review de novo. See id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252609 - 2020-01-23
[PDF]
Ronald C. Kleutgen v. Robert A. McFadyen, Jr.
of law, which we review de novo. Applied here, the trial court’s determinations as to what the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20079 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. Applied here, the trial court’s determinations as to what the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20079 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William A. Pangman v. Shawano County
of law we review de novo. Juneau County, 221 Wis.2d at 639, 585 N.W.2d at 591. 6 We resolve all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13693 - 2014-09-15
of law we review de novo. Juneau County, 221 Wis.2d at 639, 585 N.W.2d at 591. 6 We resolve all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13693 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Angelo J. Ewing
the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4196 - 2017-09-19
the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4196 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 84
review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84685 - 2014-09-15
review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84685 - 2014-09-15