Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21941 - 21950 of 40284 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 21941 - 21950 of 40284 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Justin H.
this task. We surmise that this is the view of his counsel based on a statement in the brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9426 - 2005-03-31
this task. We surmise that this is the view of his counsel based on a statement in the brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9426 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
as Prinsen. Liebenthal also pulled over to the side of the road and later provided a statement to the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70833 - 2011-09-13
as Prinsen. Liebenthal also pulled over to the side of the road and later provided a statement to the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70833 - 2011-09-13
Frontsheet
Robinson pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding. The referee took note of the SPD's statement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32862 - 2008-05-28
Robinson pay the costs of the disciplinary proceeding. The referee took note of the SPD's statement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32862 - 2008-05-28
[PDF]
State v. John D. Tiggs, Jr.
. Tiggs’ argument focuses on a statement made by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24816 - 2017-09-21
. Tiggs’ argument focuses on a statement made by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24816 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gerald D. T.
accomplice gave incriminating statements about their involvement in the crimes. The State then separately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9764 - 2017-09-19
accomplice gave incriminating statements about their involvement in the crimes. The State then separately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9764 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the prosecutor’s challenged statement called into question the State’s commitment to the joint sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166055 - 2017-09-21
that the prosecutor’s challenged statement called into question the State’s commitment to the joint sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166055 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph M. Malinowski
the statements were admissible as an excited utterance or as a nonhearsay, prior consistent statement because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5705 - 2017-09-19
the statements were admissible as an excited utterance or as a nonhearsay, prior consistent statement because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5705 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the following statement made by the circuit court during the plea colloquy: “And then the third thing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925282 - 2025-03-11
on the following statement made by the circuit court during the plea colloquy: “And then the third thing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925282 - 2025-03-11
Mid-Plains, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
. With respect to this case, the circuit court’s premature and unnecessary statements and rulings with respect
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13788 - 2005-03-31
. With respect to this case, the circuit court’s premature and unnecessary statements and rulings with respect
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13788 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the PSI did not include statements from his former employers that would have “define[d] [his] character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33843 - 2008-09-02
that the PSI did not include statements from his former employers that would have “define[d] [his] character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33843 - 2008-09-02