Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21951 - 21960 of 30242 for de.
Search results 21951 - 21960 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
State v. James L. Kurtz
is a question of law, which [we] review[] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20149 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which [we] review[] de novo.” State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20149 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kimberly Paswaters v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
to Harold’s culpability. The plaintiffs appeal. ¶13 We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7332 - 2017-09-20
to Harold’s culpability. The plaintiffs appeal. ¶13 We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7332 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Thomas G. Schanke v. Mitchell Street State Bank
unless clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (1999-2000). We review questions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4073 - 2017-09-20
unless clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (1999-2000). We review questions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4073 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
reviews de novo. See State v. Mendoza, 227 Wis.2d 838, 849, 596 N.W.2d 736, 742 (1999). We follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14408 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo. See State v. Mendoza, 227 Wis.2d 838, 849, 596 N.W.2d 736, 742 (1999). We follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14408 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
meet the constitutional standard, which I review de novo. ¶6 Bray claims that questioning of him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236318 - 2019-02-28
meet the constitutional standard, which I review de novo. ¶6 Bray claims that questioning of him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236318 - 2019-02-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79396 - 2014-09-15
. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79396 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Id. Then, based on those facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44227 - 2009-12-09
erroneous. Id. Then, based on those facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable suspicion justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44227 - 2009-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. (citation omitted). However, we review de novo whether the facts which were properly found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110523 - 2014-04-22
.” Id. (citation omitted). However, we review de novo whether the facts which were properly found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110523 - 2014-04-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing is a question of law we review de novo.” Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶21. ¶12 Under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190531 - 2017-09-21
hearing is a question of law we review de novo.” Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶21. ¶12 Under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190531 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Maureen Rainer v. Jerome C. Gathier
grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Springs Farm v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2426 - 2017-09-19
grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Springs Farm v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2426 - 2017-09-19