Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21951 - 21960 of 29823 for des.

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Phyliss K. T.
de novo. Id. ¶14 Phyliss first argues that she was unable to dispute Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4033 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, whether the facts entitle the defendant to withdraw his plea is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96281 - 2013-05-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 632.32, a question of law that we review de novo. No. 2020AP1793 4 See Thom v. 1st Auto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446954 - 2021-10-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See Therese S., 314 Wis. 2d 493, ¶7. In doing so, we look to the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182774 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. ¶7 Flowers first argues his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174961 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the due process right to be sentenced on accurate information is a constitutional question we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181780 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FMN Management Services, Inc. v. Kolb
). Applying the same methodology, we review a circuit court’s summary judgment decision de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14637 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Winnebago County Department of Health & Human Services v. Diane L.M.
. retroactively. Whether to retroactively apply the holding of a case is a question of law that we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7628 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gabriel L. Ortiz
statute, WIS. STAT. § 973.20. We review this question de novo without deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
there are no material facts in dispute. Id., ¶5. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Fortier v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981589 - 2025-07-10