Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21961 - 21970 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
cites numerous pages of cross-examination testimony in support of his constitutional claim, including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999093 - 2025-08-20

Paul J. Everson v. Richard J. Lorenz
, rendering the property unbuildable for the Plaintiffs. The Eversons claimed to have sustained monetary
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1251 - 2004-01-27

State v. Jill J. Kunish-Wolff
were tried together and both convicted. We first address the claim that the conviction of both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12311 - 2005-03-31

Betty Novak v. Plum Creek Timberlands
because the plaintiffs did not record their easement claim within the time provided in Wis. Stat. § 893.33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6243 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael W. Jones
a two-pronged analysis for such claims. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11562 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CTI of Northeast Wisconsin, LLC v. Larry Herrell
the Herrells, the Herrells filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5469 - 2017-09-19

Waterloo & Sioux Falls, Ltd. v. National Guardian Life Insurance Company
for additional interest. Waterloo sued, claiming that NGL’s action in setting a 2:00 p.m. deadline was improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11958 - 2005-03-31

State v. Hector J. Boissonneault
sentence should be modified. Underlying all of these arguments is a claim that the presentence report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11748 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
has not identified the witnesses whom he claims counsel should have interviewed or what they would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35711 - 2009-03-02

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yolanda M.
in support of her “unfairness” claim. She says first that she was incarcerated in the Rock County Jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2363 - 2005-03-31