Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21961 - 21970 of 61989 for child support.

[PDF] Certification
latitude rule “support[s] the more liberal standard of admissibility in child sexual assault cases
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618259 - 2023-02-08

State v. Charles D. Young
in the alley “looked suspicious” but he was unable to point to any facts supporting that conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11920 - 2005-03-31

WI App 14 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2232-CR Complete Title...
was convicted for first-degree intentional homicide and physical abuse of a child for crimes he committed when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76286 - 2012-02-28

[PDF] WI APP 114
.” Under WIS. STAT. § 893.415(1), relating to actions to collect support payments, an “action means any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52452 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, that the similarities were more compelling: We have a child victim in both of the cases …. Also we have a familial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680390 - 2023-07-19

[PDF] State v. Shelleen B. Joyner
” was described in an earlier part of the statement as the father of Trudy Joyner’s child, and someone of whom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4592 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Charles D. Young
was unable to point to any facts supporting that conclusion. There is no indication in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11920 - 2017-09-21

Joan A. German v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
been found constitutional in the past because they were narrowly focused. In support
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17356 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 44
person authorized to take a child into custody under ch. 48 or to take a juvenile into custody under ch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78961 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
that the record contains facts supporting their arguments for reversal.” Shoreline Park Pres., Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27779 - 2014-09-15