Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21971 - 21980 of 29827 for des.
Search results 21971 - 21980 of 29827 for des.
Meriter Hospital, Inc. v. Dane County
summary judgment to Meriter on the DRG rate issue. We review orders granting summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5806 - 2005-03-31
summary judgment to Meriter on the DRG rate issue. We review orders granting summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5806 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
are clearly erroneous and considering, de novo, whether the conclusions of law are correct. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118929 - 2014-08-04
are clearly erroneous and considering, de novo, whether the conclusions of law are correct. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118929 - 2014-08-04
Charles Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.
is one of law. Koestler v. Pollard, 162 Wis. 2d 797, 802, 471 N.W.2d 7 (1991). We apply a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17364 - 2005-03-31
is one of law. Koestler v. Pollard, 162 Wis. 2d 797, 802, 471 N.W.2d 7 (1991). We apply a de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17364 - 2005-03-31
State v. Milton A. Bumpers
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106, 571 N.W.2d 417
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3707 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106, 571 N.W.2d 417
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3707 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101362 - 2013-08-28
, which we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d 410
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101362 - 2013-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89147 - 2012-11-13
that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89147 - 2012-11-13
Robert Kreckel v. Pieper Electric, Inc.
)(b) (2003-04).[2] ¶8 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25931 - 2006-08-29
)(b) (2003-04).[2] ¶8 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25931 - 2006-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
to grant summary judgment de novo. Snyder v. Badgerland Mobile Homes, Inc., 2003 WI App 49, ¶7, 260 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42977 - 2009-11-02
to grant summary judgment de novo. Snyder v. Badgerland Mobile Homes, Inc., 2003 WI App 49, ¶7, 260 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42977 - 2009-11-02
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 433. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo review. Id. If the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101375 - 2013-08-22
N.W.2d 433. The facial sufficiency of the motion is subject to de novo review. Id. If the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101375 - 2013-08-22
[PDF]
Kathrine I. Barber v. Anne Schmitz Arnesen
evidence sufficiency de novo. Seraphine v. Hardiman, 44 Wis. 2d 60, 65, 170 N.W.2d 739 (1969). We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5978 - 2017-09-19
evidence sufficiency de novo. Seraphine v. Hardiman, 44 Wis. 2d 60, 65, 170 N.W.2d 739 (1969). We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5978 - 2017-09-19