Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21971 - 21980 of 29823 for des.
Search results 21971 - 21980 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
known. Using the same methodology as the trial court, we review its decision de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60051 - 2011-03-29
known. Using the same methodology as the trial court, we review its decision de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60051 - 2011-03-29
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60436 - 2011-03-01
). Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60436 - 2011-03-01
Frontsheet
, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91259 - 2013-01-03
, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91259 - 2013-01-03
[PDF]
State v. Ary L. Jones, Sr.
violated is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 The leading United States Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4558 - 2017-09-20
violated is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 The leading United States Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4558 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88998 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous. Second, we review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88998 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jerome L. Thoms
and is reviewed de novo. Id. at 140, 569 N.W.2d at 582. We will uphold the circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15297 - 2005-03-31
and is reviewed de novo. Id. at 140, 569 N.W.2d at 582. We will uphold the circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15297 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law which we review de novo.” Ibid. (citation omitted; italics added). A trial court misuses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67302 - 2011-07-11
is a question of law which we review de novo.” Ibid. (citation omitted; italics added). A trial court misuses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67302 - 2011-07-11
James R. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
. The interpretation of an insurance contract presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Oaks v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13509 - 2005-03-31
. The interpretation of an insurance contract presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Oaks v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13509 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. We review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles, Post, 301 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101287 - 2013-08-27
. Id. We review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles, Post, 301 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101287 - 2013-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that is subject to de novo review. Below v. Norton, 2008 WI 77, ¶19, 310 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35894 - 2009-03-17
presents a question of law that is subject to de novo review. Below v. Norton, 2008 WI 77, ¶19, 310 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35894 - 2009-03-17