Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21981 - 21990 of 59252 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] State v. Paul Sappington
investigate Sappington’s claimed sleep disorder and advising him to plead no contest. Sappington also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16200 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Appeal No. 2007AP203 Cir. Ct. No. 2004CV285
. The receiver requested a verdict of $1.9 million against each defendant on the breach of fiduciary duty claim
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33168 - 2014-09-15

Paul J. Everson v. Richard J. Lorenz
, rendering the property unbuildable for the Plaintiffs. The Eversons claimed to have sustained monetary
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1251 - 2004-01-27

COURT OF APPEALS
, claiming multiple inaccuracies in the presentence investigation report (PSI). At the start
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93298 - 2013-02-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was obtained by misrepresentation. The Hiltners claimed in the circuit court they had only recently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211823 - 2018-04-25

[PDF] State v. Mack S.
. However, Barry S.’s claim that the victim of the armed robbery was prepared to recant his identification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7653 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. William Faison
an order denying his postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. Faison claims: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12576 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Eric J. Yelk
4 A no contest plea means that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11850 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Paul J. Everson v. Richard J. Lorenz
representations of LORENZ, rendering the property unbuildable for the Plaintiffs. The Eversons claimed to have
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1251 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] John L. Burns v. Douglas M. Scheel
Burns appeal a judgment denying their claim for a prescriptive easement over adjoining property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11789 - 2017-09-20