Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21981 - 21990 of 74538 for public records.
Search results 21981 - 21990 of 74538 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a burden to show an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the Record for the sentence at issue. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79392 - 2014-09-15
a burden to show an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the Record for the sentence at issue. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79392 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the public; (7) she did not know the correct maximum sentences for the crimes until the morning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54716 - 2010-09-22
the public; (7) she did not know the correct maximum sentences for the crimes until the morning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54716 - 2010-09-22
Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
of the adjustment committee’s decision. We agree but conclude that there was substantial evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13416 - 2005-03-31
of the adjustment committee’s decision. We agree but conclude that there was substantial evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13416 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason E. Fladhammer
” in the record, one consistent with guilt and the other with innocence, the jury is at liberty to choose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4985 - 2017-09-19
” in the record, one consistent with guilt and the other with innocence, the jury is at liberty to choose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4985 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Heather C.P.
in open court on the record, did not apply to the tolling provisions of para. (1)(a). Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12049 - 2017-09-21
in open court on the record, did not apply to the tolling provisions of para. (1)(a). Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12049 - 2017-09-21
Jeffrey P. Cheney v. Wilfred E. Morrow
uphold a trial court’s exercise of discretion if the record shows a process of reasoning based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5935 - 2005-03-31
uphold a trial court’s exercise of discretion if the record shows a process of reasoning based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5935 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wilson Realty Co. of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Board of Review for the City of Milwaukee
in question or like property.’” Markarian, 45 Wis. 2d at 686 (citation omitted). Here, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7474 - 2017-09-20
in question or like property.’” Markarian, 45 Wis. 2d at 686 (citation omitted). Here, the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7474 - 2017-09-20
Patricia A. Leider v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Such has not been established in this record. Not applying a statutory requirement renders the requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8183 - 2005-03-31
. Such has not been established in this record. Not applying a statutory requirement renders the requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
). No. 2006AP3151-CR 5 ¶10 Moreover, the record demonstrates an appropriate exercise of sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29892 - 2014-09-15
). No. 2006AP3151-CR 5 ¶10 Moreover, the record demonstrates an appropriate exercise of sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29892 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071492 - 2026-02-05
. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071492 - 2026-02-05