Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21991 - 22000 of 29810 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” is not supported by the evidence. ¶11 Our review of a jury verdict is not, of course, de novo. Rather, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87624 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Terrance J. O'Neill
and detached decision maker, is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. McBride, 187 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5078 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
application of constitutional principles to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34977 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] IBEW Local Union No. 2150 v. Rodney Stone
questions of law that we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19958 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Wisconsin Natural Gas Company v. Gabe's Construction Co., Inc.
6 Our review of a trial court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12205 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 14
court’s findings of fact unless those are clearly erroneous.5 Id. We review de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235452 - 2019-04-05

[PDF] Charles E. Keller v. Paul F. Sawyer
this court reviews de novo. Benjamin Plumbing, Inc. v. Barnes, 156 Wis. 2d 276, 279-80, 456 N.W.2d 628 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4276 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Bauer, 2000 WI App 206, ¶7 n.2, 238 Wis. 2d 687, 617 N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197781 - 2017-10-12

COURT OF APPEALS
closer than 2nd cousin. ¶10 The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law, reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36247 - 2009-04-20

COURT OF APPEALS
are not convinced. ¶23 Whether charges are multiplicitous is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57466 - 2010-12-06