Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 21991 - 22000 of 33796 for dismissal.
Search results 21991 - 22000 of 33796 for dismissal.
[PDF]
NOTICE
and, in return, the prosecutor dismissed other charges against him. We reject Ward’s assertions. ¶4 Ward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29986 - 2014-09-15
and, in return, the prosecutor dismissed other charges against him. We reject Ward’s assertions. ¶4 Ward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29986 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
) (dismissal for failing to comply with a scheduling order is discretionary with the circuit court), overruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33037 - 2014-09-15
) (dismissal for failing to comply with a scheduling order is discretionary with the circuit court), overruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33037 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
that was presented in open court. In exchange for Haug’s plea, the State agreed to dismiss and read in an additional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109558 - 2014-03-23
that was presented in open court. In exchange for Haug’s plea, the State agreed to dismiss and read in an additional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109558 - 2014-03-23
[PDF]
State v. Phillip W. Spagnola
denying his motion to dismiss the criminal complaint because he was prosecuted under § 948.02(2), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8297 - 2017-09-19
denying his motion to dismiss the criminal complaint because he was prosecuted under § 948.02(2), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8297 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Dunham moved to dismiss the mandatory minimum penalty. The circuit court denied the motion. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169786 - 2017-09-21
, Dunham moved to dismiss the mandatory minimum penalty. The circuit court denied the motion. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169786 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to party to the crime of possession with intent to deliver cocaine, the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31510 - 2014-09-15
to party to the crime of possession with intent to deliver cocaine, the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31510 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
be dismissed for failure to preserve an appeal. It is true that Alex’s attorney did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30872 - 2014-09-15
be dismissed for failure to preserve an appeal. It is true that Alex’s attorney did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30872 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
be dismissed and “read in,” which meant that the court could consider the facts and circumstances
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147809 - 2015-08-27
be dismissed and “read in,” which meant that the court could consider the facts and circumstances
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147809 - 2015-08-27
Action Law v. Habush
that Action could either present additional evidence or dismiss. We also held previously that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14309 - 2005-03-31
that Action could either present additional evidence or dismiss. We also held previously that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14309 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin L. Sendejo
, and the State would dismiss the penalty enhancer. The maximum penalty for each count was forty years in prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4067 - 2005-03-31
, and the State would dismiss the penalty enhancer. The maximum penalty for each count was forty years in prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4067 - 2005-03-31