Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 221 - 230 of 7217 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja 120 Karangpandan Karanganyar.
Search results 221 - 230 of 7217 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja 120 Karangpandan Karanganyar.
COURT OF APPEALS
the conditional use permit and land use permit “cover[ed] everything because it [wa]s a garage.” Spickler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66288 - 2011-06-20
the conditional use permit and land use permit “cover[ed] everything because it [wa]s a garage.” Spickler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66288 - 2011-06-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
[wa]s substantial.” Id., 146 Wis. 2d at 140, 430 N.W.2d at 589. Here, Cooper and others were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54868 - 2014-09-15
[wa]s substantial.” Id., 146 Wis. 2d at 140, 430 N.W.2d at 589. Here, Cooper and others were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54868 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
[we]re greatly similar and the [evidence] overlap [wa]s substantial.” Id., 146 Wis. 2d at 140, 430
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54868 - 2010-09-27
[we]re greatly similar and the [evidence] overlap [wa]s substantial.” Id., 146 Wis. 2d at 140, 430
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54868 - 2010-09-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
6 ¶17 Third, Lombrano complains because the trial court found that he “[wa]s the only person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121738 - 2014-09-16
6 ¶17 Third, Lombrano complains because the trial court found that he “[wa]s the only person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121738 - 2014-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
….” Id., ¶8. As such, the court held there had been no tolling because “a municipal traffic citation [wa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134124 - 2015-02-02
….” Id., ¶8. As such, the court held there had been no tolling because “a municipal traffic citation [wa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134124 - 2015-02-02
Ilona Preiss v. Alfred Preiss
for this purpose, we reasoned that “this [wa]s a trip that he could not trade, he couldn’t sell, he couldn’t take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16312 - 2005-03-31
for this purpose, we reasoned that “this [wa]s a trip that he could not trade, he couldn’t sell, he couldn’t take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16312 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Age of Pending Summary - County Wide Report
Categories Median age of Pending Pending Cases 0- 90 Days % under 90 days 91-120 Days % under
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty22.pdf - 2023-02-13
Categories Median age of Pending Pending Cases 0- 90 Days % under 90 days 91-120 Days % under
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty22.pdf - 2023-02-13
[PDF]
Age of Pending Summary
Categories Median age of Pending Pending Cases 0- 90 Days % under 90 days 91-120 Days % under
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty24.pdf - 2025-03-06
Categories Median age of Pending Pending Cases 0- 90 Days % under 90 days 91-120 Days % under
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agependingcounty24.pdf - 2025-03-06
State v. Steven D. Cathey
credit of 120 days. He raises no other issues. Because we conclude that Cathey was not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11189 - 2005-03-31
credit of 120 days. He raises no other issues. Because we conclude that Cathey was not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven D. Cathey
motion for postconviction relief. The requested postconviction relief was a sentence credit of 120 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11189 - 2017-09-19
motion for postconviction relief. The requested postconviction relief was a sentence credit of 120 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11189 - 2017-09-19

