Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 221 - 230 of 90167 for case record search.
Search results 221 - 230 of 90167 for case record search.
State v. Marty R. Caban
or objection appears in the record, and may direct the entry of the proper judgment or remit the case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16907 - 2005-03-31
or objection appears in the record, and may direct the entry of the proper judgment or remit the case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16907 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Marty R. Caban
This case presents two issues for review: (1) whether Caban raised the issue of probable cause to search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16907 - 2017-09-21
This case presents two issues for review: (1) whether Caban raised the issue of probable cause to search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16907 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Certification
correctly notes, in this case, the underlying facts surrounding Burch’s consent to search his cell phone
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297434 - 2020-10-20
correctly notes, in this case, the underlying facts surrounding Burch’s consent to search his cell phone
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297434 - 2020-10-20
[PDF]
Tayr Kilaab Al Ghashiyah (Kahn) v. Gary R. McCaughtry
Amendment. He then points out that “[t]his is not a case where strip searches occur after [Casteel] mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14667 - 2017-09-21
Amendment. He then points out that “[t]his is not a case where strip searches occur after [Casteel] mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14667 - 2017-09-21
Tayr Kilaab Al Ghashiyah (Kahn) v. Gary R. McCaughtry
by the three strip searches.[4] That is, instead of separately analyzing the facts of record under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14667 - 2005-03-31
by the three strip searches.[4] That is, instead of separately analyzing the facts of record under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14667 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 238
that this search was above and beyond any legal obligation that it had under the public records law. It asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30649 - 2014-09-15
that this search was above and beyond any legal obligation that it had under the public records law. It asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30649 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 238
identified potential records responsive to his request, to conduct a search for those records. Further, Gehl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30649 - 2007-11-27
identified potential records responsive to his request, to conduct a search for those records. Further, Gehl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30649 - 2007-11-27
State v. Charles J. Hajicek
that the evidence in this case was discovered during a police search was not clearly erroneous. We thus affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14870 - 2005-03-31
that the evidence in this case was discovered during a police search was not clearly erroneous. We thus affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14870 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles J. Hajicek
court reviewed the facts set forth in the record and found “that the search was a police search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14870 - 2017-09-21
court reviewed the facts set forth in the record and found “that the search was a police search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14870 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
into No. 2022AP1135-CR 9 question, the recording of the controlled buy provided probable cause for the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676250 - 2023-07-07
into No. 2022AP1135-CR 9 question, the recording of the controlled buy provided probable cause for the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676250 - 2023-07-07