Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 221 - 230 of 837 for holt.
Search results 221 - 230 of 837 for holt.
COURT OF APPEALS
a trial court’s decision on other grounds even if we do not agree with its reasoning. See State v. Holt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31822 - 2008-02-13
a trial court’s decision on other grounds even if we do not agree with its reasoning. See State v. Holt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31822 - 2008-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
that a trial court reached “the proper result for the wrong reason,” we will affirm. State v. Holt, 128 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36565 - 2009-05-26
that a trial court reached “the proper result for the wrong reason,” we will affirm. State v. Holt, 128 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36565 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
result for the wrong reason,” we will affirm. State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36565 - 2014-09-15
result for the wrong reason,” we will affirm. State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36565 - 2014-09-15
State v. Elaine Veasley
. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8636 - 2005-03-31
. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App. 1985).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8636 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is not an alternative rationale on which we might affirm the circuit court’s judgment, see State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375113 - 2021-06-09
is not an alternative rationale on which we might affirm the circuit court’s judgment, see State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375113 - 2021-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
analysis. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985) (reviewing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34276 - 2008-10-14
analysis. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985) (reviewing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34276 - 2008-10-14
[PDF]
State v. Scott E. Laituri
. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124-25, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985). ¶7 A defendant seeking modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7041 - 2017-09-20
. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124-25, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985). ¶7 A defendant seeking modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7041 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Edwin C. West v. Byran Bartow
for the wrong reason, it will be affirmed. State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3821 - 2017-09-20
for the wrong reason, it will be affirmed. State v. Holt, 128 Wis. 2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3821 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. William D. Shaw
of discretion. See id.; see also State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 122-23, 382 N.W.2d 679, 686 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11301 - 2017-09-19
of discretion. See id.; see also State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 122-23, 382 N.W.2d 679, 686 (Ct. App. 1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11301 - 2017-09-19
State v. Nickole Flynn
the right result and therefore affirm. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14534 - 2005-03-31
the right result and therefore affirm. See State v. Holt, 128 Wis.2d 110, 124, 382 N.W.2d 679, 687 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14534 - 2005-03-31