Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 221 - 230 of 64854 for timed.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
denying his motion for reconsideration of sentence.[1] Weller received no credit for time spent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26971 - 2006-10-31

[PDF] State v. Keith E. Williams
on the cross-appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file notice of cross-appeal of Christopher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18172 - 2017-09-21

State v. Keith E. Williams
-appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file notice of cross-appeal of Christopher William Rose of Rose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18172 - 2005-07-06

John P. Catlin v. Kirstin A. Catlin
asserts the circuit court erred by using John’s “half-time” income and by finding that Kirstin is able
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5358 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John P. Catlin v. Kirstin A. Catlin
-time” income and by finding that Kirstin is able to work full time. Finally, Kirstin argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5358 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
for the time they spend driving a company-provided vehicle between their homes and their assigned jobsites
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237774 - 2019-05-30

[PDF] Kay R. Wichman v. Robert J. Wichman
when it misapplied WIS. ADM. CODE § HSS 80.04(2), relating to shared-time payers. Because the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14863 - 2017-09-21

Kay R. Wichman v. Robert J. Wichman
), relating to shared-time payers. Because the trial court did not apply the "equivalent care" standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14863 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that “the time period shall be measured from the dates of the … violations” that form the basis of the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204998 - 2017-12-13

State v. Ted W. Urdahl
of the Wisconsin Constitution. ¶2 We conclude the time period from the dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30